Skip to main content

For organisations

Set a brief. Never meet the child who answers it.

Verified organisations work with Aurelia the way a publisher works with a school — through briefs, content and opportunities that pass through institutional review, never through a direct line to a young person.

A printed challenge brief with a gold seal, pinned notes and a project label
Illustrative · Brief
Hands sketching a poster design with markers, swatches and tape
Illustrative · Response
A cardboard and electronics prototype beside annotated design sketches
Illustrative · Outcome

Images are illustrative examples of the kind of project work a brief can inspire. They are not member work and depict no identifiable people or direct contact with children.

Partnership model

Brief → review → aggregate outcomes

Every step is institutional. There is no side channel and no individual child data flows back to the partner.
Hands sketching a poster design with markers, swatches and tape on a studio desk
A brief, answered

What organisations can do

Publish a challenge, not a relationship

Aurelia lets an organisation set a task worth doing — a design brief, a research question, a piece of writing — and offer genuine recognition for it, entirely through institutional workflows.

Set a real challenge

Define a task with a clear brief, age band and judging criteria, aligned with what young creators can genuinely produce.

Offer genuine recognition

Successful entries can feed into a young person's Achievement Passport once a verified teacher confirms the work.

Work through the platform

All communication, submission and feedback happens through Aurelia's reviewed workflow, never through a side channel.

Strict boundaries

What organisations can never do

These are not policy preferences — they are structural limits, enforced in how Aurelia is built, not left to an organisation's good intentions.

No child accounts

An organisation cannot create, hold or manage an account for any child, under any circumstance.

No child directory

There is no list of children an organisation can browse, search or select from — children are never visible to an organisation as individuals.

No private contact with children

An organisation never messages, emails or otherwise contacts a child directly. All interaction happens through published challenges reviewed by Aurelia staff.

No behavioural profiling

Organisations cannot build behavioural profiles of children, or target, segment or recommend content to an individual child based on engagement or profile data.

No data export

Organisations cannot export child contact details or private child data. Only what a judging process genuinely needs is shared, and only with guardian consent.

No mentoring under-16s

There is no direct mentoring, coaching or one-to-one relationship between an organisation and an under-16 member. Adult-to-adult mentoring exists only in the separate 16+ Alumni environment.

The institutional workflow

Nothing reaches a young person unreviewed

Five steps, in order, from verifying an organisation to reporting on what a programme achieved. There is no shortcut between any two of them.

  1. 01

    Verify the organisation

    Identity, purpose and safeguarding awareness are checked before an organisation can propose anything at all.

  2. 02

    Approve the programme

    Aurelia staff review the proposed programme, challenge or content for age-appropriateness, safeguarding risk and compliance with platform boundaries.

  3. 03

    Publish the challenge or content

    Only once approved does the brief reach schools and families, who decide for themselves whether their children take part.

  4. 04

    Moderated submissions, only if shared

    Entries arrive moderated and sanitised, and only where a child specifically requested to share the work and the required adult approvals were given.

  5. 05

    Aggregate outcomes

    Reporting comes back as aggregate and approved programme outcomes — participation levels, formats, themes and impact — never as identifiable child records.

A cardboard and electronics prototype beside annotated design sketches on a workbench
Illustrative · Programme outcome

Reporting

You learn what your programme achieved, not who took part

Verified organisations receive aggregate and approved programme reporting — enough to understand and evidence impact, never enough to identify or reach an individual child.

  • Aggregate participation by age band, region or programme, with no individual child identified.
  • Themes, formats and approved highlights from the work the programme inspired.
  • Outcome summaries suitable for a funder, trustee board or impact report.
  • Approved, guardian-consented example work where a family and school specifically agreed to it.

Why the boundaries exist

A challenge should be a gift, not a funnel

Aurelia's value to an organisation is the chance to inspire genuine work from young people — not a route to their attention, their data or their households. The boundaries exist to keep that distinction permanent.

  • Guardian consent remains required for a child to take part in any challenge.
  • Schools and families can withdraw from an organisation's challenge at any time.
  • Aurelia reserves the right to decline or remove any proposal that does not meet these standards.

Propose a challenge for young creators

Tell us about your organisation and the task you would like to set. We review every proposal before it reaches a school or family.